Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 19:22:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 615E8F75F59D263BEF691D8BD45F3BE26C964C21149D98ED8B04013466A3A8F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses a personal opinion based on the law and circumstances. The author further explains in the article why they don’t think this case reaches the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616842446880804865
  • participantId - 615E8F75F59D263BEF691D8BD45F3BE26C964C21149D98ED8B04013466A3A8F9
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674328925622
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1616842446880804865615E8F75F59D263BEF691D8BD45F3BE26C964C21149D98ED8B04013466A3A8F9