Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 21:58:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B657B4B920A5EF764E8BF7D263A5D519D70563D3E5781C67C13DE218B9B5A64
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses a personal opinion based on the law and circumstances. The author further explains in the article why they don’t think this case reaches the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616842446880804865
  • participantId - 1B657B4B920A5EF764E8BF7D263A5D519D70563D3E5781C67C13DE218B9B5A64
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674338301831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16168424468808048651B657B4B920A5EF764E8BF7D263A5D519D70563D3E5781C67C13DE218B9B5A64