Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 19:39:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1548669A16CFDF1A63DB2F3A1B41F1C730FFA754934F0441D01D0D765D6F5948
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses a personal opinion based on the law and circumstances. The author further explains in the article why they don’t think this case reaches the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616842446880804865
  • participantId - 1548669A16CFDF1A63DB2F3A1B41F1C730FFA754934F0441D01D0D765D6F5948
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674329972179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16168424468808048651548669A16CFDF1A63DB2F3A1B41F1C730FFA754934F0441D01D0D765D6F5948