Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 18:12:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9753C3AFE857F60EF3CC2F7A2BD3F2F58F2DBB829FFE842634D5CD2B06C8588
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId - B9753C3AFE857F60EF3CC2F7A2BD3F2F58F2DBB829FFE842634D5CD2B06C8588
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1674411155472
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1616837286968332288B9753C3AFE857F60EF3CC2F7A2BD3F2F58F2DBB829FFE842634D5CD2B06C8588