Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 17:09:21 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B09F781916F293B6FBD161C2E714EF2EA01365C2A82B46FA9FCA5B8864B0229B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId - B09F781916F293B6FBD161C2E714EF2EA01365C2A82B46FA9FCA5B8864B0229B
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1674320961410
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1616837286968332288B09F781916F293B6FBD161C2E714EF2EA01365C2A82B46FA9FCA5B8864B0229B