Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 09:57:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an expressed opinion. No note needed. Counter opinions are best expressed in replies for earnest discussion. The most effective means to discover truthful things is through thoughtful, respectful and earnest discourse. Neutral language is preferred. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/8/719/2754210?login=false

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1616837286968332288
participantId - 83ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC
raterParticipantId -
createdAtMillis - 1674381420245
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 1
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 161683728696833228883ABF31ED6F75E992F5328D9484424DBA92EA062D8FC36FF586D6A1205646CEC