Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-20 05:21:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8397B8EFF5E66D74E3D766849AAD6651C15A83BE48BE57BF0E5A1A8D5A1A4AE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading as it’s a personal stance given the context of the situation. Other note is unnecessarily disparaging Tweet author.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616236443520892930
  • participantId - 8397B8EFF5E66D74E3D766849AAD6651C15A83BE48BE57BF0E5A1A8D5A1A4AE7
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674192061738
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16162364435208929308397B8EFF5E66D74E3D766849AAD6651C15A83BE48BE57BF0E5A1A8D5A1A4AE7