Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-20 01:03:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49DB37825EB230FFA1F2D623F0E7D99C801CFB3C917C00CF2AB38D94D96886E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading as it’s a personal stance given the context of the situation. Other note is unnecessarily disparaging Tweet author.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616236443520892930
  • participantId - 49DB37825EB230FFA1F2D623F0E7D99C801CFB3C917C00CF2AB38D94D96886E4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674176584507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161623644352089293049DB37825EB230FFA1F2D623F0E7D99C801CFB3C917C00CF2AB38D94D96886E4