Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-18 06:47:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2AEA9ED3DA6400396C52D80A01F2228464500CE0542F165B3AF3D4B53E36320
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note here appears to be partisan in nature and purely defends Justin Trudeau. It does not refute each of the claims. And disagreement on policy or interpretation of which (halt / claw back) and so on is best reserved for comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1615545503374274560
  • participantId - F2AEA9ED3DA6400396C52D80A01F2228464500CE0542F165B3AF3D4B53E36320
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674024472616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1615545503374274560F2AEA9ED3DA6400396C52D80A01F2228464500CE0542F165B3AF3D4B53E36320