Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-10 03:51:28 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 479D7C5F98493FD6FCBEB2062CB7B6D9A7D4E9590B9B724B92E0C68020F732D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the author’s replies make me think twice, it is nonetheless worth noting that satire- including ridicule- is listed among Birdwatch’s reasons a tweet is not misleading. This appears to be clear ridicule of the political drive to associate LGBT+ folk with child grooming

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1612570600597524480
  • participantId - 479D7C5F98493FD6FCBEB2062CB7B6D9A7D4E9590B9B724B92E0C68020F732D4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1673322688648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1612570600597524480479D7C5F98493FD6FCBEB2062CB7B6D9A7D4E9590B9B724B92E0C68020F732D4