Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-22 04:10:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79EE9127819E9192EB98246051A2D18348D13917D5CB443554F125CA4422DC95
Participant Details

Original Note:

Looking at the Acknowledgements in "The Population Bomb", it doesn't appear to have undergone any sort of formal peer review process. Numerous reviewers are mentioned, but they are not anonymous, and Ehrlich doesn't indicate that their concerns were all addressed: http://pinguet.free.fr/ehrlich68.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1611088993273401344
  • participantId - 79EE9127819E9192EB98246051A2D18348D13917D5CB443554F125CA4422DC95
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674360651011
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 161108899327340134479EE9127819E9192EB98246051A2D18348D13917D5CB443554F125CA4422DC95