Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-02 18:06:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75E323AA33E2BCC1F18EECD253A26BB7877C468D6281A2FCD8552F69070A617A
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Good for the environment" isn't a useful measure in this case. Any extraction or manufacturing is potentially "bad" for the environment. If this tweet's intent is to say that EVs are worse than gasoline powered vehicles then it fails factually. https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/electric-vehicles-by-the-numbers/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1609830529091907585
  • participantId - 75E323AA33E2BCC1F18EECD253A26BB7877C468D6281A2FCD8552F69070A617A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1672682813171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 160983052909190758575E323AA33E2BCC1F18EECD253A26BB7877C468D6281A2FCD8552F69070A617A