Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-03 03:20:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 297325412C9B152DD0D15F2AB6349FC5AB1097DC4DD5401C4C5BDFBE3F8C2861
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Good for the environment" isn't a useful measure in this case. Any extraction or manufacturing is potentially "bad" for the environment. If this tweet's intent is to say that EVs are worse than gasoline powered vehicles then it fails factually. https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/electric-vehicles-by-the-numbers/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1609830529091907585
  • participantId - 297325412C9B152DD0D15F2AB6349FC5AB1097DC4DD5401C4C5BDFBE3F8C2861
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1672716049603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1609830529091907585297325412C9B152DD0D15F2AB6349FC5AB1097DC4DD5401C4C5BDFBE3F8C2861