Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-03 03:00:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Good for the environment" isn't a useful measure in this case. Any extraction or manufacturing is potentially "bad" for the environment. If this tweet's intent is to say that EVs are worse than gasoline powered vehicles then it fails factually. https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/electric-vehicles-by-the-numbers/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1609830529091907585
  • participantId - 0E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1672714834217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16098305290919075850E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96