Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-23 18:17:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21D0FB5A8C22DD44FE3FC82A9D7DC4CCD9C6365E2D68A9D7CD8EC6A6E14C571C
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no published nor public statistic to verify this claim. Twitter has various levels of measuring views, engagement and other metrics. It is also not clear nor defined what counts as a view under the latest updates. https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/using-the-tweet-activity-dashboard

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1606114898332762114
  • participantId - 21D0FB5A8C22DD44FE3FC82A9D7DC4CCD9C6365E2D68A9D7CD8EC6A6E14C571C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671819446838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 160611489833276211421D0FB5A8C22DD44FE3FC82A9D7DC4CCD9C6365E2D68A9D7CD8EC6A6E14C571C