Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-23 02:52:47 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BCD0B7E6B043BA1BB4E364ADFDCAA2782E01F5A9E47AD0494C3155D69B4712F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no published nor public statistic to verify this claim. Twitter has various levels of measuring views, engagement and other metrics. It is also not clear nor defined what counts as a view under the latest updates. https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/using-the-tweet-activity-dashboard

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1606114898332762114
  • participantId - 0BCD0B7E6B043BA1BB4E364ADFDCAA2782E01F5A9E47AD0494C3155D69B4712F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671763967721
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16061148983327621140BCD0B7E6B043BA1BB4E364ADFDCAA2782E01F5A9E47AD0494C3155D69B4712F