Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-21 10:18:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2467BE15CCBCE04D573C09006A0A1AE8B5A9EBBF8DFF56863D7CDFE9DBF71B3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reason magazine points out that “[e]ven if the money is simply compensating companies … it reads way too close to bribing tech companies to do their bidding and could certainly sway some decisions that these companies make.” https://reason.com/2022/12/19/the-fbi-paid-twitter-3-4-million-for-processing-requests/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1605424842983067648
  • participantId - 2467BE15CCBCE04D573C09006A0A1AE8B5A9EBBF8DFF56863D7CDFE9DBF71B3E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671617896410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16054248429830676482467BE15CCBCE04D573C09006A0A1AE8B5A9EBBF8DFF56863D7CDFE9DBF71B3E