Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-21 00:29:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73E313E3E609BD537C9910C991280EDCD0E5E365544A8DE15F4C16E6D7B722E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Users can easily read the quoted tweet and determine for themselves whether or not his claim - that the gov paid Twitter to censor people - is made out of context. Therefore, no added context is needed from community notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1605251045927501824
  • participantId - 73E313E3E609BD537C9910C991280EDCD0E5E365544A8DE15F4C16E6D7B722E5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671582597078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160525104592750182473E313E3E609BD537C9910C991280EDCD0E5E365544A8DE15F4C16E6D7B722E5