Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-18 19:25:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91BBF7BF252250F7273212AE79DEBB76F688394FAC317BB79E41B1C91C7A20D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court has already ruled that flight data is not PII. However, technology has evolved, as with most technical evolutions the law has not caught up. This is new grounds for the court. Someone would have to challenge this against existing precedent in: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604526101941735424
  • participantId - 91BBF7BF252250F7273212AE79DEBB76F688394FAC317BB79E41B1C91C7A20D4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671391522302
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160452610194173542491BBF7BF252250F7273212AE79DEBB76F688394FAC317BB79E41B1C91C7A20D4