Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-18 21:13:36 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CC16E19782C1A32C29EF501E508DE3344E37BC57A19C1833647B9059A7A0CEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court has already ruled that flight data is not PII. However, technology has evolved, as with most technical evolutions the law has not caught up. This is new grounds for the court. Someone would have to challenge this against existing precedent in: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604526101941735424
  • participantId - 8CC16E19782C1A32C29EF501E508DE3344E37BC57A19C1833647B9059A7A0CEE
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671398016179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16045261019417354248CC16E19782C1A32C29EF501E508DE3344E37BC57A19C1833647B9059A7A0CEE