Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-19 04:12:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42549E58DD5541539288BF2D9CA5733FEF09F81B260A7713EA916F16F2D39F19
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court has already ruled that flight data is not PII. However, technology has evolved, as with most technical evolutions the law has not caught up. This is new grounds for the court. Someone would have to challenge this against existing precedent in: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2076&context=faculty_publications

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1604526101941735424
  • participantId - 42549E58DD5541539288BF2D9CA5733FEF09F81B260A7713EA916F16F2D39F19
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1671423148142
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160452610194173542442549E58DD5541539288BF2D9CA5733FEF09F81B260A7713EA916F16F2D39F19