Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-13 17:10:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 597BDEF06D5295E525F92FE0EFDCA36D1FDC38026A5E82D997A4B4B78AC3A1F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter cautioned that the paper has limitations. Third parties made political classifications and as such the results of analysis may vary depending on which source is used. Twitter added that ideology is not a factor their systems consider when recommending content. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2021/rml-politicalcontent

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1602465404915310592
  • participantId - 597BDEF06D5295E525F92FE0EFDCA36D1FDC38026A5E82D997A4B4B78AC3A1F7
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670951418051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1602465404915310592597BDEF06D5295E525F92FE0EFDCA36D1FDC38026A5E82D997A4B4B78AC3A1F7