Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-10 02:30:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFECC43F9841F409E60BEC71D8D5F095DF32AD37D0F9FBDEE4018F53995D8E50
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet implies favoritism toward the Biden administration, but the source included does not have such biased language and merely indicates that Twitter would not ban official @POTUS or @WhiteHouse accounts, which were not in question during Trump's ban.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601362666970386432
  • participantId - CFECC43F9841F409E60BEC71D8D5F095DF32AD37D0F9FBDEE4018F53995D8E50
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670639448326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601362666970386432CFECC43F9841F409E60BEC71D8D5F095DF32AD37D0F9FBDEE4018F53995D8E50