Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-11 04:16:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52BBD27912001FBF3342F9776F75CD7F14656778D4F11EB2ED9201308CB5B7A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zero evidence is provided showing Justice Thomas has been corrupt in his Supreme Court rulings. There is however ample evidence for each ruling he has made showing the opposite to be true. This can be found on a per case basis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601344947130712067
  • participantId - 52BBD27912001FBF3342F9776F75CD7F14656778D4F11EB2ED9201308CB5B7A5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670732211734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160134494713071206752BBD27912001FBF3342F9776F75CD7F14656778D4F11EB2ED9201308CB5B7A5