Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 18:12:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA86C11FE4FF1D8E2D92FBA76F68D9F9B32226FBAFE78E23C5E372045F31B638
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intellectually dishonest. The special notations were to prevent rage banning by middle management. Upper management knew it was a politically "problematic" account and would require careful consideration on exactly how to censor or ban the account

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601160497763700736
  • participantId - CA86C11FE4FF1D8E2D92FBA76F68D9F9B32226FBAFE78E23C5E372045F31B638
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670609546843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601160497763700736CA86C11FE4FF1D8E2D92FBA76F68D9F9B32226FBAFE78E23C5E372045F31B638