Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-13 18:34:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFC1A80A476D7B830E9079DA21779AA3836F2517BD2F32735D7DF5F84467CFA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intellectually dishonest. The special notations were to prevent rage banning by middle management. Upper management knew it was a politically "problematic" account and would require careful consideration on exactly how to censor or ban the account

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601160497763700736
  • participantId - BFC1A80A476D7B830E9079DA21779AA3836F2517BD2F32735D7DF5F84467CFA1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670956475415
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601160497763700736BFC1A80A476D7B830E9079DA21779AA3836F2517BD2F32735D7DF5F84467CFA1