Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-10 01:57:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79B1CC8EA3B4689D759CE3D4CE937CB1FA0B1D99F41F6EEA3BC708F44031D337
Participant Details

Original Note:

Intellectually dishonest. The special notations were to prevent rage banning by middle management. Upper management knew it was a politically "problematic" account and would require careful consideration on exactly how to censor or ban the account

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601160497763700736
  • participantId - 79B1CC8EA3B4689D759CE3D4CE937CB1FA0B1D99F41F6EEA3BC708F44031D337
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670637445815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 160116049776370073679B1CC8EA3B4689D759CE3D4CE937CB1FA0B1D99F41F6EEA3BC708F44031D337