Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 07:26:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50E7187C9CC47AE62C79178490824ED05E11DB89C8EB21C62A1D2EA996CF44AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The user is providing no proof other than his word, as well as not providing all other data that could provide context. By cherry-picking what stats to tout, with no release of even surface level data, the user is potentially manipulating other users with misleading statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601096693704966145
  • participantId - 50E7187C9CC47AE62C79178490824ED05E11DB89C8EB21C62A1D2EA996CF44AF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670570798812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 160109669370496614550E7187C9CC47AE62C79178490824ED05E11DB89C8EB21C62A1D2EA996CF44AF