Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 17:34:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The user is providing no proof other than his word, as well as not providing all other data that could provide context. By cherry-picking what stats to tout, with no release of even surface level data, the user is potentially manipulating other users with misleading statements.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601096693704966145
  • participantId - 43C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670607249791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 160109669370496614543C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E