Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 17:11:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2F14EB31C19A50AF95EFFE4C1A75A38DDD8D2A18B73D882D4A20BDE5A68303B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter claimed it did not shadow ban accounts. But certain executives did want to disfavor particular users; therefore, Twitter employees used the spam policy as justification for shadow banning certain accounts. However, these accounts were not actually spamming twitter. https://mobile.twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601023504916172800

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601057512626814976
  • participantId - F2F14EB31C19A50AF95EFFE4C1A75A38DDD8D2A18B73D882D4A20BDE5A68303B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670605895958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601057512626814976F2F14EB31C19A50AF95EFFE4C1A75A38DDD8D2A18B73D882D4A20BDE5A68303B