Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 10:07:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E050E56B1F3685E7B582E1B2CD8ED35EC86DC90F33C2420F3F6B5363893DBB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was determined by the previous Twitter administration that tweets Raichik reported did not violate Twitter’s private information policy, as outlined here: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information Weiss says the content continues to exist. Presumably the new administration agrees that the policy was not violated.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601032944235282432
  • participantId - 8E050E56B1F3685E7B582E1B2CD8ED35EC86DC90F33C2420F3F6B5363893DBB2
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670580475844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16010329442352824328E050E56B1F3685E7B582E1B2CD8ED35EC86DC90F33C2420F3F6B5363893DBB2