Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 10:30:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 309FBDD706325B805F85C50E4CFF6A6CE2B4206E44472166E1A8E14A8D623465
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was determined by the previous Twitter administration that tweets Raichik reported did not violate Twitter’s private information policy, as outlined here: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information Weiss says the content continues to exist. Presumably the new administration agrees that the policy was not violated.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601032944235282432
  • participantId - 309FBDD706325B805F85C50E4CFF6A6CE2B4206E44472166E1A8E14A8D623465
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670581837594
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601032944235282432309FBDD706325B805F85C50E4CFF6A6CE2B4206E44472166E1A8E14A8D623465