Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-09 03:39:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aside from Twitter already stating that @libsoftiktok didn't violate any policy, all that user does is repost content. If there was something negative, it's because it had already been posted by someone else.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1601027219425476611
  • participantId - E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670557175661
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1601027219425476611E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827