Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-06 04:22:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E869CB2545D16F80E5773496CEA2319FF0243270B87C39610F3D5BD892C67EE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The content of this tweet thread is all supported by the evidence present in the linked journal article. https://t.co/QNmF8rIneH The information is valuable to the Twitter community for ethical public health decision-making.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599956353631526913
  • participantId - E869CB2545D16F80E5773496CEA2319FF0243270B87C39610F3D5BD892C67EE0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670300534923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1599956353631526913E869CB2545D16F80E5773496CEA2319FF0243270B87C39610F3D5BD892C67EE0