Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-06 09:13:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AB68C90B279B2AAEFE4D7E6F40CED1D48A120676337DAA7899C1A28CD320355
Participant Details

Original Note:

The content of this tweet thread is all supported by the evidence present in the linked journal article. https://t.co/QNmF8rIneH The information is valuable to the Twitter community for ethical public health decision-making.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599956353631526913
  • participantId - 4AB68C90B279B2AAEFE4D7E6F40CED1D48A120676337DAA7899C1A28CD320355
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670318012851
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15999563536315269134AB68C90B279B2AAEFE4D7E6F40CED1D48A120676337DAA7899C1A28CD320355