Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-04 04:35:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E891C4BB5A4B36E175BF04143C8A5A1744281554C3DE516208E8DB9B01E8B299
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly an expression of an opinion. Notes requiring context simply disagree with the opinion being expressed. Given the wealth of opinions about the first instalment of the Twitter Files, readers do not require the context of what this is about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599193612364947456
  • participantId - E891C4BB5A4B36E175BF04143C8A5A1744281554C3DE516208E8DB9B01E8B299
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670128544319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1599193612364947456E891C4BB5A4B36E175BF04143C8A5A1744281554C3DE516208E8DB9B01E8B299