Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-04 02:09:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5B082A68C6F3150A476B9F59E72F0707D89B0432BF7DF9388190A7045E7C9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is clearly an expression of an opinion. Notes requiring context simply disagree with the opinion being expressed. Given the wealth of opinions about the first instalment of the Twitter Files, readers do not require the context of what this is about.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1599193612364947456
  • participantId - 0A5B082A68C6F3150A476B9F59E72F0707D89B0432BF7DF9388190A7045E7C9D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670119774725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15991936123649474560A5B082A68C6F3150A476B9F59E72F0707D89B0432BF7DF9388190A7045E7C9D