Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 17:04:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60FFE580F917AEEBEC28D9D00B28B121580D411937E6BD5B6E3037A8DB19A1DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rebuttal to previous notes. Yes both parties had access to censor items. It is later made obvious the slant of the moderation. The point that is being missed isn’t a politics. It is that the use of government to pressure censorship does become a 1st Amendment violation. https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598829996264390656?s=46&t=W1gZSowwPT9YFhaKh5BVWA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598924784854863872
  • participantId - 60FFE580F917AEEBEC28D9D00B28B121580D411937E6BD5B6E3037A8DB19A1DA
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670087058844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159892478485486387260FFE580F917AEEBEC28D9D00B28B121580D411937E6BD5B6E3037A8DB19A1DA