Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 08:38:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44019842FD7A87B5D4208DBCD7A50C8F59E1215625B08310B0AB5EDFD5E73661
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rebuttal to previous notes. Yes both parties had access to censor items. It is later made obvious the slant of the moderation. The point that is being missed isn’t a politics. It is that the use of government to pressure censorship does become a 1st Amendment violation. https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598829996264390656?s=46&t=W1gZSowwPT9YFhaKh5BVWA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598924784854863872
  • participantId - 44019842FD7A87B5D4208DBCD7A50C8F59E1215625B08310B0AB5EDFD5E73661
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670056690692
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159892478485486387244019842FD7A87B5D4208DBCD7A50C8F59E1215625B08310B0AB5EDFD5E73661