Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-20 04:26:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B7E772CD534625CEEFC7EC6EC9B516550CDA73542D10E3D47573403A8FCEB7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter users don't have 1st Amendment protection unless the government (Trump admin in 2020) coerced Twitter. However, Twitter voluntarily accepted feedback. It's unclear whether Twitter violated their own TOS by not disclosing that US govt officials had moderating privileges https://www.freedomforum.org/free-expression-on-social-media/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,websites%20as%20they%20see%20fit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598889573458841600
  • participantId - 2B7E772CD534625CEEFC7EC6EC9B516550CDA73542D10E3D47573403A8FCEB7E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674188777330
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15988895734588416002B7E772CD534625CEEFC7EC6EC9B516550CDA73542D10E3D47573403A8FCEB7E