Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-12-03 10:04:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3643649B71EEA7405665ACFB44B1386EB303638BC8168E14D809784E35A234E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The user is responding to a NY Times article saying hate speech is up. However, he is doing an apples/oranges comparison. He is using internal data that hate speech tweets that have been reported + taken down have less views. The Times uses total hate speech, reported or not. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/technology/twitter-hate-speech.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1598776004100689932
  • participantId - F3643649B71EEA7405665ACFB44B1386EB303638BC8168E14D809784E35A234E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670061885094
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1598776004100689932F3643649B71EEA7405665ACFB44B1386EB303638BC8168E14D809784E35A234E