Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-30 16:35:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A85F927C9E2230CA97A16F2D42A0863AE8F865C26076FFD7493E49F75D5CC756
Participant Details

Original Note:

The methodology (DW-Nominate) used in this analysis does not measure political philosophy. It documents how politicians vote in relation to their own party, regardless of the substance of the underlying votes. It does not distinguish different points on a political spectrum. https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-mismeasurement-of-polarization

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1597815664017743872
  • participantId - A85F927C9E2230CA97A16F2D42A0863AE8F865C26076FFD7493E49F75D5CC756
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669826118045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1597815664017743872A85F927C9E2230CA97A16F2D42A0863AE8F865C26076FFD7493E49F75D5CC756