Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-27 20:06:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5E3F5B6C5C11C0E66FE96664AEB86BFA61E3C124AAC76A60AD08C94671CDEE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Chad Loder’s account was recently reinstated, among others who had their original bans reversed. This new ban, specifically for ban evasion, looks suspicious given the context of Loder’s research.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1596870966088450050
  • participantId - B5E3F5B6C5C11C0E66FE96664AEB86BFA61E3C124AAC76A60AD08C94671CDEE1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669579566197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1596870966088450050B5E3F5B6C5C11C0E66FE96664AEB86BFA61E3C124AAC76A60AD08C94671CDEE1