Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-30 00:50:08 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Chad Loder’s account was recently reinstated, among others who had their original bans reversed. This new ban, specifically for ban evasion, looks suspicious given the context of Loder’s research.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1596870966088450050
  • participantId - AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669769408100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1596870966088450050AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B