Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-30 00:23:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 074D27E223FD6188E9C2368CD84FB54FED7BDC7A750524017F6227E5D1C5E93F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Chad Loder’s account was recently reinstated, among others who had their original bans reversed. This new ban, specifically for ban evasion, looks suspicious given the context of Loder’s research.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1596870966088450050
  • participantId - 074D27E223FD6188E9C2368CD84FB54FED7BDC7A750524017F6227E5D1C5E93F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669767823588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1596870966088450050074D27E223FD6188E9C2368CD84FB54FED7BDC7A750524017F6227E5D1C5E93F