Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-22 23:03:54 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09D2EA66DA5A5FFD503DEEDD98EC63B6D60EBEC4F0DC611F90185F78842C1D56
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unfortunately this is so crazy there isn't a direct fact checking link to include here. But we have this - Judicial Watch has 100% NON factual rating. https://www.politifact.com/personalities/judicial-watch/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594988755638636545
  • participantId - 09D2EA66DA5A5FFD503DEEDD98EC63B6D60EBEC4F0DC611F90185F78842C1D56
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669158234316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159498875563863654509D2EA66DA5A5FFD503DEEDD98EC63B6D60EBEC4F0DC611F90185F78842C1D56