Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 18:19:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3B6851790C5EDAC5E4D05F40A0A24D88CAAE200DEFD1DA2F77E1EFA3B0C70CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no proof that any government investigation would be retaliation. It's not "retaliatory" to investigate the acquisition of a publicly traded company, with the assistance of foreign money, to take it off the stock market. That's standard procedure. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-national-security-grounds-for-investigating-musks-twitter-acquisition/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594751540794900480
  • participantId - E3B6851790C5EDAC5E4D05F40A0A24D88CAAE200DEFD1DA2F77E1EFA3B0C70CF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669054743215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1594751540794900480E3B6851790C5EDAC5E4D05F40A0A24D88CAAE200DEFD1DA2F77E1EFA3B0C70CF