Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-21 20:31:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BF227DA517AF308C603082725104955B4FF6E24FF9B6EB67AAB24F664C6689A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no proof that any government investigation would be retaliation. It's not "retaliatory" to investigate the acquisition of a publicly traded company, with the assistance of foreign money, to take it off the stock market. That's standard procedure. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-national-security-grounds-for-investigating-musks-twitter-acquisition/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594751540794900480
  • participantId - 5BF227DA517AF308C603082725104955B4FF6E24FF9B6EB67AAB24F664C6689A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1669062661851
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15947515407949004805BF227DA517AF308C603082725104955B4FF6E24FF9B6EB67AAB24F664C6689A