Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-19 21:48:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Originalism "All statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified." It is an objective interpretation of the Constitution. His claims of corruption are not supported by any evidence https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/white-papers/on-originalism-in-constitutional-interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594072395555475459
  • participantId - 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668894480173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15940723955554754599EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0