Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-11-20 15:47:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49122DB89D50D64E2A4A53EC1DA775BD1F1FB29299F46276F59FDDFC606B4204
Participant Details

Original Note:

Originalism "All statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified." It is an objective interpretation of the Constitution. His claims of corruption are not supported by any evidence https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/white-papers/on-originalism-in-constitutional-interpretation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1594072395555475459
  • participantId - 49122DB89D50D64E2A4A53EC1DA775BD1F1FB29299F46276F59FDDFC606B4204
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1668959240811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 159407239555547545949122DB89D50D64E2A4A53EC1DA775BD1F1FB29299F46276F59FDDFC606B4204